Olympic Citizen

Two Passports, One Dream...

Where are you from?

A simple question, often the first you're asked as you're getting to know someone. It's the fastest way a stranger can zero in on you, start to form your shape in his head. Once you've got that information, you can zoom forth with the bold strokes figured out. Always hated that question.

Mostly because I don't have a good answer. When smiling strangers ask me that question, I stammer and generally come off sketchy as hell. "I was, uh, born in Montreal, but um, grew up around the States." Pause. I add: "But I've been in New York a long time." Cue uncomfortably smiling stranger to change the subject.

This should not be a difficult question, but it's become one for me because of the Olympics. It's not a complicated story:

I was born in Montreal, Canada, spent my first few years there, American expat parents moved back, decided to raise the family in the States. Became a swimmer. Got good enough to think Olympics. In the lead up to the Games, I faced facts: In the country where I was raised and educated, I was the 5th best in the country in my best event. In the country of my birth, I was the 2nd best. I played the odds, and went with country I hadn't lived in since I was a kid. Patriotic pride did not weigh into this decision, on either side. Olympic ambition did.

I want to be an Olympian. More than I want to be an American. More than I want to be a Canadian. I pledge more allegiance to a flag of five interlinked rings. More than anything else, I want to be a part of that moveable four-year feast of competitive utopia. I'm not alone in this. In fact, I'm a part of a unique population of Olympic nation hoppers.

We're those dual citizens who make pragmatic choices of nationality in order to pursue a dream that can't be contained by borders.

First, a distinction: This does not include athletes whose citizenship was purchased by a Middle East nation (Say, Qatar), competitors who sell their passports and agree to compete for a small rich nation interested in using the Olympics as a marketing campaign, using foreign athletes as well paid pawns in a misguided game. We're not that cynical.

But we are opportunists. That part's impossible to deny. Due to circumstances of family and birth, we have straddled borders of citizenship and self-identity all our lives. With more than one passport to choose from, we can make athletic career choices that others can't. Is that fair? Is it fair to be born and raised by the ocean in Southern California, within ten miles of a dozen world-class coaches? At a certain point, no matter how hard you might have worked, you begin to realize the incredible amount of luck involved. Sure, there's insane sacrifice and endless training, but at its root, your Olympic potential came down to your parents and your environment, well before you showed even a glimmer of talent in your first summer league successes.

You either seized those opportunities, or you didn't.

This mindset does not always sit well with those whose notions of nationality are set in stone. For these masses, nationality is the definition of identity itself. Forget where their ancestors came from way back when, they are Americans first, last, and always. Or Chinese, or German, or Australian. Who you are means where you are from, right?

A few months before my own Olympic Trials, back in the winter of 1995, I was living with a proud American Olympian, a guy who would subsequently go on to join the Marines. He thought I was borderline traitorous. I once overheard him drunkenly tell a buddy that "Casey can't be Canadian. He barely watches hockey!" Half-bright stereotypes aside, it wasn't the only time I heard such sentiments.

On the pool deck at the Olympics in Atlanta, a friend from a small South American nation joked that I didn't deserve to be there, since I "wasn't really Canadian." My imagined response: "Fuck you, you don't appreciate this at all. If you did, you would have made it to a morning practice every once in awhile. Don't talk to me about deserving anything." My actual response: Nervous chuckle and a "whatever, dude."

These might sound like old raw wounds that never healed. And maybe they are. But every four years in the spring time, those old memories resurface with every country's Olympic Trials. There are always athletes out there, like me, who choose to represent one nation over another in pursuit of Olympic ambition. It's never a comfortable choice. You hear whispers even when they're not there. You become overly prideful of the country you chose, overly critical of the country you didn't. This does not make you more of one and less of another; it's just a knee-jerk effort to fit in.

There's a common line you hear from first generation or multiracial folks when you ask them "what side" they identify with more. Invariably, they'll say they feel more like one when they're with the other. Meaning, a child of biracial parents (like say Tiger Woods) will probably say he feels more black when among Asians. And more Asian when among blacks. You're always Other, always not quite from the same place as your peers. I can relate. When I visit Canada nowadays, I feel uncomfortably American. But when I'm among American swimmers, especially around the Olympics, I'm aggressively and proudly all Canadian. The truth is, neither flag feels like it fits quite right.

The Olympic flag, on the other hand? Isn't that what it's all about? A world united, linked together in common cause? That was Pierre de Coubertin's ideal all along: "The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not winning but taking part; the essential thing in life is not conquering but fighting well." That's from the guy who founded these Modern Games... It's a hard line to square with the unfortunate obsession on medal counts among the world's superpowers.

But the Olympics have always walked a fine line between corruption and purity. On one hand, you have the rampant ugly nationalism, the cheating; on the other you have the Opening Ceremony, and the Olympic Village. I'll embrace the latter, and deal with the former, even as the dark side sometimes threatens to overwhelm all those good Village vibes...

Speaking of villages, if you live in New York City long enough, and you realize you're surrounded by folks who never quite felt comfortable with where they were from. Or at least never wanted it to define their identity... There's solidarity in those shifting allegiances. We're all here in pursuit of something personal and ambitious. We're also a cab ride away from Ellis Island. Not too many better reminders in the world that your precious citizenship can be subject to change. New Yorkers have always known in their bones that where you're from doesn't mean much.

What counts is where you're going.

Heartbreak on the Way Home

Solidarity for Canada's Stefan Hirniak... "What can you say?" asked my friend Adam. "It's beyond words."

I didn't have an answer. Still don't. Not really sure why I'm even writing this. All I know is that I don't think I've ever felt for a fellow swimmer - a guy I've never met - more in my life. And Adam and I both know that a fellow Canadian 200 flyer could really use some support right about now. His name is Stefan Hirniak. Last night at the Canadian Olympic Trials, he missed making the Team over the final 25 meters of the race, fading to finish 4th. The exact same thing happened to him four years ago, at the Trials for Beijing. Both times he was a favorite to make it. Both times it came down to that final 50, heading for home.

The Adam I'm referring to is Adam Sioui - the guy who won the 200 fly at Canadian Trials back in 2008. The same event I won, in the same pool in Montreal, twelve years before that, in 1996. 200 flyers tend to be a certain tribe of swimmer, same as the quirky breaststrokers or the masochistic milers. Not sure what adjective you stick in front of the flyers, but you know the type. When you represent the same country, swimming the same event, over a few generations of National Teams, you tend to look out for the guys who come next. Hirniak came next.

He was faster than Sioui or I. He's the Canadian Record Holder in fact, with a lifetime best of 1:57.01. A time recorded back in 2010, without the benefit of the Suits, I might add.

Heartbreak is part of the Olympic Trials. In any country, any sport. When you get down to it, it's what gives these pressure-drenched events their beauty. So few go home with glowing hearts, their goals fulfilled. Most limp back to their home pools with dashed Olympic dreams. But few experience heartbreak on the scale of Hirniak.

It's something you don't get over anytime soon. But there is a bright light at the end of this dark tunnel...

I told my partner Lars about what happened to Hirniak last night in Montreal. His response was thoughtful, and not what you'd expect to hear right after this level of disappointment: "Well, if he's able to look at it the right way, it will probably make him more successful in his life after swimming," said Lars.

Come again? Isn't the cliché supposed to be how becoming an Olympian makes everything after that much easier? How that great sporting success informs your later professional career, injecting you with a level of special Games-anointed confidence? Well, not exactly, not for everyone.

Lars proceeded to point out a laundry list of former Olympic champions (who shall remain nameless...) whose lives effectively stopped right after their mighty moment of glory. In the true, tragic "To An Athlete Dying Young" way... (If you don't know A.E. Housman's classic poem, please read it now, right HERE.) That success becomes a high water mark that can never be duplicated, so the rest of days become a rather sad dull buzz kill, with the volume turned way down.

But to miss it? To get so very close, not once but twice? To have the wall within sight like that...

That's not something you wish upon anyone. But I'll tell you what it is: This is someone you want to hire once those psychic wounds have had some time to heal. It's someone I'd bet large sums of money on succeeding - once that new path is taken.

I know Stefan Hirniak doesn't want to hear it right now. Would you? But this isn't some look-at-the-bright-side spin to a Trials Heartbreak. This is actually the case. Life extends a whole hell of a lot longer than a few cruel moments in a swimming pool in your 20's. And when those moments don't pan out as planned, well, those are often the men and women who stay hungry for life.

Who go on to truly great things, far beyond mere Games...

The Devil and Miss Manaudou

Comeback Success For the French Olympic Queen A warm welcome back to the lovely Laure... Yesterday at the French Olympic Trials, Laure Manaudou sealed her return to the Olympic stage with victory in the women's 100 back. Her time - 1:00.16 - was no joke. Just tenths off her lifetime best, and fast enough to put her back in the game for the medals in London. An Olympic champion eight years ago in Athens, with a lifetime of celebrity and scandal stuffed in between, one of the greats of her generation is back.

It's become tiresome to preface every race result with that fast-suit disclaimer (we all know everyone was faster in the warped years of '08-'09), so let's keep the suits out of it. The sport is a more interesting place with Laure Manaudou in it. Compared to what she's been through, times on the clock are boring and incidental.

To review: From 2004 to 2007, Manaudau was arguably the greatest female swimmer on earth. In Athens, she won gold in the 400 free, silver in the 800 free, and bronze in the 100 back. Her victory in the 400 made her France's first woman ever to win Olympic swimming gold. It also made her a massive celebrity across the pond. Two years later, she broke the unbreakable - Janet Evans' world record in the 400 free. A record that had stood untouched for 18 years. A year after that, at the 2007 World Championships, she broke the world record in the 200 free too. At the Worlds in Melbourne, she also defended her world title in the 400, and added silver in the 800 and the 100 back.

Then the wheels came off.

A month after '07 Worlds, Manaudou announced that she was making a traitorous move - she was leaving her longtime coach, Phillipe Lucas, and she was leaving her country. She was off to Italy. She was chasing a guy. The man in question: an Italian lothario named Luca Marin. A fellow World Champs medalist (bronze in the 400 IM in Melbourne), Marin held the keys to Laure's heart. He also held some very compromising pictures of his girlfriend.

That December, at the short course Worlds in Budapest, Hungary, the lovers had an ugly public quarrel. A ring was thrown, a break up was announced. And that very day, those pictures surfaced online. (I'll resist the impulse to provide a link; if you haven't seen them, go ahead and Google it...) Marin denied having anything to do with it. Sure, buddy, so did Rick Salomon... (Paris anyone?)

Regardless of who pulled the trigger, the damage was clearly done as far as Manaudou's psyche was concerned. She showed up at the Beijing Olympics a broken swimmer. She flat out quit in the final of the 400 free, fading to a hard-to-watch 8th in the 400. She added a lackluster 7th in the 100 back, and didn't bother to make it through the semi-final in the 200 back. And then she was gone. Retired at 21.

Fortunately, that was not all she wrote. What's the best revenge for a broken heart? Why, shacking up with a better man, of course. Manaudou soon did just that. Marin was a pretty good swimmer, a World Champs medal is nothing to sneeze at, but he's nowhere near in the same league as the guy who replaced him. A guy named Fred Bousquet: former world record holder in the 50 free, and one of the fastest men on earth for many years now. (The guy is also as ripped as a cartoon superhero...) In April 2010, the French power couple had a baby girl named Manon.

Any wonder why Manaudou's comeback has been a success?

She flew across the pond to States, moved to Auburn, where her man Bousquet had achieved such soaring success for the Tigers. And it all came back.

As we've seen in Australia, the fate of the comeback crew has been pretty grim. Thorpe, gone. Klim, out. Huegill, no show. Trickett, a semi-success, an alternate on the Aussie relay. The coming track record of others on the trail will likely be just as grim. It's tough to comeback.

But when you retire at 21, before you've even reached your peak, when your personal life comes full circle to a family and a happily ever after... Is it any wonder Miss Manaudou is back on the Olympic stage?

And So Much for That

Thorpedo Fails to Launch... 12th in 200 free at Aussie Trials

Despite every sign, I refused to believe it. I just couldn't conceive of Ian Thorpe failing like this. He seemed to have prepared (convinced?) himself for this outcome awhile back, but I suppose I thought it was his way of managing those crushing external expectations.

Turns out, the sad fact is that Thorpe just no longer has it.

Yesterday in the 200 free at Aussie Trials, he delivered a respectable morning swim of 1:49.1 - good enough for 5th place. Since the Aussies aren't quite as deep as the Americans, the best among them can cruise a bit through the heats. Checking out Thorpe's prelims splits it looked like he might have just shut it down on the back half. His split at the 100 - 51.7 - was by far the fastest of the bunch. But then he was crawling home, in a weak 29.2. Appears he wasn't just conserving energy. It wasn't there.

In the semifinal later that night, he relaxed a bit going out, flipping in 52.1. He was still in the game but fading badly at the 150, with his 3rd 50 over a second slower than his 2nd. And then... nothing.

1:49.91. 12th Place.

His last lap was slower, by significant margins, than all but one of the Aussie semifinalists.

There was a time when that last lap was a thing of beauty. When his feet went into overdrive and accelerated away from the field. Just like Phelps and Lochte and Biedermann, and the rest of the guys we so hoped he'd be racing in London...

Thorpe still has the 100 left. Maybe he'll sneak onto the Team with a 5th or 6th place finish and return to the Games as a relay alternate. But the Aussies are currently the favorites for gold in the men's 4x100 free relay, and it's clear Thorpe is not close to the league of his young compatriots who'll be on that relay in the London final.

Goes without saying that Thorpe handled the disappointment with class. No surprise there.

But here's one comeback junkie who probably should have never gone back to the sauce...

Trials, Now or Later?

Brits and Aussies choose their squads while Yanks wait till June... Finally it gets interesting. Covering the swim beat isn't much like being on the trail of a pro sports league. No real season to track, no daily, or even semi-weekly highlights for SportsCenter. Just long underwater intervals between meets, when we get a peak at what's been going on in those endless workouts... This suits me just fine. How can one care about 162 games of anything? Still, those long slow winter months can sure try the patience of your earnest swim fan.

But that's all over now. It's March and it's an Olympic year, and that means the results matter.

Last week, British Olympic Trials kicked things off. The London hosts were decent, sure to be a few Olympic champions amongst them. Hannah Miley's 400 IM (4:32.6) and Rebecca Adlington's 400 free (4:02.3) were a couple of stand-outs, with Adlington primed to defend her Beijing gold on home soil and Miley ready to square off against Australia's Stephanie Rice and defending world champ Elizabeth Beisel.

Still, the Brits are like the Canadians (pumped to be in Montreal in two weeks time...) and the Germans, the Dutch, the South Africans and the rest. Always a few amazing gold medal threats mixed in there, but still a tier below the big guns when it comes to overall Olympic dominance. That, for now, remains the domain of two nations above all others. The Aussies and the Americans, of course.

One of those superpowers is in the water as we speak; the other still has a few months before the Team is chosen.

Last night, on day one of Aussie Trials, Stephanie Rice showed she's still got it, super suit or not, with a fast 400 IM of 4:33.4. The other finals were respectable (an Aussie record for Thomas Fraser-Holmes in the 400 IM, at 4:11.8), but not exactly podium potential.

Tomorrow - or make that in a few hours, Aussie time - is when things really get interesting. It's Ian Thorpe's return - with his 200 free prelims and semis. By almost every indication, time, and quote, the Thorpedo will fail to launch. Which is why I'm hoping he drops an insane swim out of nowhere. A 1:45 or so, to really get folks chattering, taking back all that schadenfreude that's been circling his comeback for months. Of course, Michael Phelps went 1:45 last weekend at the Grand Prix in Columbus, coming straight from altitude training in Colorado Springs, so maybe it will take a lot more than for Thorpe to impress...

Whatever he does, it will overshadow the greatest swimmer Down Under. A 20-year-old kid named James Magnussen, who happens to be the greatest 100 freestyler on earth, and has to be considered the even-money favorite to take gold in London. He'll probably beat Thorpe in the 100 by two seconds or so, and get a lot less ink in doing it. No matter, Magnussen would have to swim one armed to miss making the Team, while Thorpe may need that full-body suit of old just to deliver a respectable top-6 showing in an end lane.

Once upon a time U.S. Trials were in early March of the Olympic year too. That changed back in 2000, when USA Swimming moved the Trials up, just a few weeks before the Games. The tactic clearly worked beautifully, so they stuck with it. Fact is, that strategy probably works best for their best performers - guys like Phelps and Lochte and Coughlin and Franklin. Swimmers who don't necessarily have to peak at Trails to make the Team. They have to be fast, no question, say 95% or so. But they don't need to leave it all out there in Omaha. For swimmers who need every last bit of mental and physical energy to get their hand on the wall in 2nd - or 3rd, 4th, 5th, or 6th in relay events - that tight turnaround makes an Olympic peak a whole lot harder.

In the meantime, there's still plenty of NCAA and Grand Prix action ahead, for those you merely interested in results stateside.

Before you know it, the rest of the dry land world will be paying attention too...

The Myth of Michael's Talent

Questioning God-given Gifts... It's easier to chalk it up to talent. It's that unfair distribution of destined-for-gold genetics that a rare few are awarded with in rich supply. Some got it, most of us don't. Or so the thinking goes...

And one guy was born with more of it than any human being ever dipped in water. You've seen this movie, right? The one about Michael Phelps being so perfectly born to swim that it's pointless for mere land-dwelling mortals even to try to compete? Indeed, four years ago, at the start of the Beijing Games, NBC ran a feature about his freakishly flawless proportions. They called it "Designed to Swim." (Check it out on You Tube right HERE if you missed it.)

The piece was well done, and hard to dispute. I mean, they were dealing in facts: stands six-foot-four; wingspan is six-foot-seven; short legs and a super long torso; size 14 feet; hands the size of dinner plates - ok, that one might not be technically fact, but you get the idea. At the top of the piece, Dan Hicks' voice-over tells you that "If you were to build the perfect swimmer, the finished product would look just like this."

Fair enough. The resumé speaks for itself.

Yet, even with all those physical facts, something essential has been lost. And it's probably the single most important element that explains Phelps' greatness. It's not those one in a million genetics. In fact, I'd argue that his genetic gifts aren't really one in a million at all. They're one in a lot, no question. Say one in a couple thousand? But he's not the only guy walking around who looks like that. Hell, hang out on deck at any national meet; you'll see plenty of guys with proportions not so different.

Nor is it his work ethic. As has been well documented (by Phelps himself), that work ethic comes and goes. When he's on, it's scary, we know this. The guy has done sets that are superhuman. But the guy has also missed a boatload of workouts over the past eight years. During the same period when he established himself, beyond all doubt, as the greatest swimmer of all time.

So, what the hell is it?

It's what happened a long time ago - back in the mid to late 90's, when Phelps was a kid, from age 10 to 15. If you want to understand Michael Phelps' greatness, stop looking at his God-given "gifts", and don't put too much stock in the many workouts he might have missed in the years since Beijing. Instead, go back about 15 years, back to a time when the kid never missed a day. Ever. For thousands of days in a row.

He hasn't been coasting on his talent these last few years. He's been coasting on perhaps the greatest base of training and aquatic education that a kid can receive.

There's a powerful book out there that breaks down this theory beautifully. It's called "Talent is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else." It's by a Fortune magazine writer named Geoff Colvin. A business book in nature, it should be required reading for every coach who reads this. Buy it on Amazon right HERE. (Mr. Colvin, if you see a slight bump in sales, you're welcome...)

Colvin's thesis centers around the notion of Deliberate Practice. That is, doing specific things over and over and over again, with constant feedback. Identifying exactly where you need to improve, and obsessing on every last detail with brutal commitment. If you're like me, you've responded to that thesis like this: No shit.

Every swimmer and coach knows the necessity of deliberate practice in his bones. Nothing groundbreaking there. It's beyond obvious to swimmers. But like all good reporters, Colvin takes something that should be basic and peels back endless layers. To reveal that most of you do it all wrong -- over and over and over again.

Phelps did not. Correction: Bob Bowman did not let him. During Phelps' most formative years, Bowman, by every account, was a grand master of deliberate practice. So much so that I was truly surprised to find no mention of Bowman or Phelps in Colvin's book.

Here's who Colvin does analyze: Mozart and Tiger Woods. Two other guys who've long carried the mantle of God-given Otherworldly Talent. Of course, we soon learn that, though plenty "gifted", both Mozart and Woods were the creations of early, obsessive - and flawlessly designed - training in their youth. Mozart's father was a composer himself, who retired when baby Wolfgang was born to devote the rest of his life to teaching music to his son. And we all know the story of Earl Woods and his all-too-deliberate golf practice before Tiger could walk. These two prodigies were made, not born. And so was Michael.

This should be good news, for all involved. For Phelps and Bowman, it should give credit where it's due -- to the years when the ultimate foundation was laid for a swimmer.

For everyone else, it should be good news for the opposite reason: It should confirm that you are not racing someone who's "just better." Who has infinitely more talent than you, so why even try... The playing field might be a lot more level than you think. It just takes a level of commitment - from a very young age - that few are willing even to consider.

If you're having a hard time buying all this, I can relate. As a swimmer, I used to carry around barrels full of bitterness for swimmers I deemed "more talented" but less willing to work as hard as I was. This is defeatist thinking, to be sure. It also misses quite a few points. Some aren't so easy to admit - like maybe I was doing the wrong thing over and over for many thousands of yards of fly sets. Or maybe that some of those sprinters over in lane eight, dicking around doing workouts that seemed like a joke -- maybe there was something a whole lot more deliberate in their practice. Things that produced results when shaved and tapered, but not necessarily things that looked tough or impressive at 6am on a random winter Tuesday.

I realize talent does indeed exist. It's not all myth. And no amount of perfectly deliberate practice starting at infancy is going to help a swimmer compete with a Phelps if they stop growing at five-foot-six, with small hands and feet. There is a limit to all this overrating of talent. But it's also time to demystify that word.

God might give out plenty of gifts, but he doesn't give away gold medals.

The Price of Momentary Madness

The Saga of Nick D'Arcy: Brawler, Butterflyer It started with disrespect. It always does, doesn't it? Buckets of booze, a slight, righteous rage... A standard story on the night train - when things get weird and nothing good happens after the clock strikes two.

Bar fights. The shameful domain of macho tools...

By all grim accounts, Aussie flyer Nick D'Arcy used to be one such macho tool. And boy, has this kid paid one hell of a price for it.

Four years ago next month, D'Arcy broke the Commonwealth record in the 200 fly at the 2008 Australian Olympic Trials. The night he was named to the Team, he went out big with his mates. Went to spot in Sydney called the Loft Bar. At some point late in the night, after Lord knows how many pints, fellow swimmer Simon Cowley said something that pissed D'Arcy off. They took it outside. D'Arcy used his elbow. You know, instead of his fist. More damage that way.

Here's an accounting of the damage he did: broken jaw, broken nose, fractured eye socket, fractured palate, crushed cheekbone. He messed up Mr. Cowley something fierce.

He was arrested and charged with what it was - assault. He was thrown off the Olympic team. A year later, he was convicted in court, received a 14-month suspended sentence. Then he was thrown off the '09 Aussie World Championships team. It wasn't over.

The damage D'Arcy had inflicted on Cowley did not heal overnight. There were reconstructive surgeries to his face. Braces to realign his demolished jaw. Post-traumatic stress disorder. His face now held together by titanium plates and screws. Years of fallout and pain thanks to that crushing elbow. So, Cowley sued and won. The court awarded him $180,000 in damages. Forced D'Arcy to declare bankruptcy. Now his next Olympic prospects in 2012 were in doubt too...

Somehow, as the collateral damage mounted, for both victim and criminal, the criminal stayed in the water. Kept training, kept at it, remained among the greatest 200 flyers on earth. (To D'Arcy's supporters who may balk at hearing him called a "criminal" - this is a literal, factual label, not an opinion. "Macho tool", on the other hand, yes, that's an opinion. There is a difference.)

Yesterday this saga seems to have finally reached its end. 1,422 days since D'Arcy's assault, the Australian Olympic Committee cleared him to compete in London, should he make the Team next month at the Aussie Trials. This shouldn't be a problem; D'Arcy is currently ranked first in the world in the 200 fly, with a big chance to be on the podium in London.

He has paid a high price, and like every criminal who does his time for the crime, it's time to forgive him, let the kid move on with his life. Though he's probably not much of a kid anymore. Just 24 years old, D'Arcy has been forced to grow up in a hurry. He was 20 when he leveled Cowley that night, and it soon emerged that it wasn't the first time. A few weeks after the incident, another Aussie sportsmen, an Ironman named Tim Peach, alleged that the same thing had happened to him. A bar fight with D'Arcy that resulted in a mangled face, albeit nowhere near to the extent of Cowley.

A pattern perhaps... The image of a cocky, quick-tempered jock is easy to conjure. Or maybe the kid was just living up to an unfortunate side of Aussie jock culture. Back in '08, when this story was a swirling scandal Down Under, the Reuters newswire even took the time to note that "while nightclub fights are commonplace in Australian football and rugby teams, they are rare in swimming."

So, the story was that a swimmer was behaving as poorly as the rugby meatheads? Ok, so would this mean that D'Arcy's blow was just immensely unlucky in the degree of damage it inflicted? If fights like this are so commonplace, then does that mean that half of Aussie Rules football players are walking around with faces held together by plates and screws? Surely a few of them, but that's hardly the story here.

The story is about a drunk 20-year-old kid out celebrating on the greatest night of his life, the night he became an Olympian. He was feeling indestructible that night. Tough and dumb and too young to grasp where one bar fight could lead.

Now he knows.

The Unbitter End

Facing the Final Curtain with Class... The end is near. For the comeback junkies, like Thorpe and Evans and the rest; for the legions who'll hang up their goggles immediately after not making the Team at Trials; even for the mighties like Phelps who'll likely swim away after London... Everyone swims a last race. This athletic death will come with all sorts of fallout...

Partying

Depression

Compulsive Behavior

A satisfied walk into the sunset, it's not. Even if it all ends with a fine rendition of your anthem played while you stand atop a podium. Which it won't, for all but the chosen few. And if it makes you feel any better, they won't be smiling much either once they've stepped down and out of the spotlight...

Retiring is brutal. No matter how well balanced you think your life might have been as a swimmer, in the aftermath, you will feel as though your soul has been sucked away. It has been; for years your soul has been marinating in chlorine. It takes awhile to clear all that junk from your system. Dark memories on a winter's day...

Of course, some wise fools manage this transition better than others. They can actually cope, with that rare gift of perspective in the present. Last Sunday, in the New York Times, there was a piece on one such athlete. A washout major league pitcher turned novelist, on his way to play ball in Italy, after failing to make it in the Show. His name is Dirk Hayhurst. His perspective should be required reading for every athlete facing the end:

“I think people want athletes to say, ‘I’m never giving up, I’m going to fight till the bitter end,’ ” Hayhurst told the Times. “But that’s just it: at the bitter end, you turn bitter. You’re like a junkie, strung out... because that’s your whole identity."

Fighting to the bitter end... Such a noble down-with-the-ship sentiment. I'd never considered the adjective in that cliché. Like good strong coffee or the best rumor, bitter can have a nice bite, but one hell of an aftertaste.

So, how to walk away?

1. Try the Hayhurst Method - Ween yourself off the drug with a lower dose. Go compete in Europe on a stage with less pressure, a less crippling level of competition. Enjoy the sport. Enjoy the lifestyle around it. Maybe a few World Cups, the Mare Nostrum tour... With best times as an after thought.

2. Cold Turkey - Dangerous, but sometimes necessary. For those whose swimming careers were, and are, a matter of life and death, a slow ween simply won't do. You're the sort who can't do a little, who can't find any satisfying high in the halfway. If that's the case, you just gotta go dry. As in, showering should be your only contact with water for a good long while. You will be unpleasant to be around for this long while. You will probably pick up some bad habits along the way. Apologize to your spouses in advance.

3. Admit to your subconscious that a comeback is coming. When you retire, you won't admit this in words or even frontal lobe thought, but deep down you'll know. C'mon, all these champions currently on the comeback trail? You think they truly believed they were done all those years they were away? I don't. If the door has been left open, even a sliver, you know it. You might not admit it, as you're packing on the pounds, trying out new careers your heart really isn't into, but sooner or later you're going to hear that Olympic anthem on one of NBC's promos and you're going to find your way back to a pool.

When that happens, more power to you. This will just delay the actual end, of course, but that's a worry for another day.

Last week in London, failed comebacker Mark Spitz spouted off about how Thorpe, Evans, and others have lost their edge and were doomed to fail - like he did, 20 years ago. As Swim News' Craig Lord points out, Spitz conveniently forgets to mention a middle-aged woman named Dara Torres. A woman who sees no end, and no need to quit.

44-year-old Torres has been analyzed endlessly, compared to countless athletes across every sport. Maybe all along, we were looking for analogies in the wrong places. Here might be Dara Torres' closest contemporary: Keith Richards.

With all these drug allusions, how can you not think of the indestructible Stone? Quitting cold turkey? Weening your way dry? These quaint notions are for mere mortals.

When the end comes, impossibly but inevitably, for Keith and for Dara, there will be no bitterness... Only a knowing, mocking smirk for those who died trying to keep up.

Place Your (Charity) Bets

Gambling, for Good, on Olympic Sport... Everything's more exciting with a bit of action on the outcome. A gambler's truism if there ever was one. Many might go with the glass half empty outlook: Nothing is exciting without some money on the line.

Wherever you fall on the compulsiveness meter, this is the one week of the year where you're probably placing a bet of some sort. Super Bowl week: the time when even teetotaling Mormons know the spread. The time when hard core bettors go on a mad frothing bender... In Vegas alone, there will be an estimated $100 million wagered legally. A drop in the cash bucket compared to the estimates worldwide. If you count offshore Internet gambling sites, illegal bookies, and the countless 'friendly' bets made in every living room in America, some say over $10 billion is bet this week on the game of games, by over 200 million people across the world.

It's a beautiful thing. Depending on how you view this fine vice... I love to gamble. Always have. Horses and poker, mainly, but having some cash on the line in any contest will always make it just that much more...

Unfortunately, wagering on our favorite sport of all has never been an option. (Officially that is...) Much as I'd love to see odds posted at the biggest meets, that doesn't seem like an idea that's going to entice the good folks at USA Swimming or the NCAA anytime soon. But just envision it for a second: 2-1 odds on Lochte beating Phelps in the 200 free. 50-1 odds on anyone beating Phelps in the 200 fly. How about a favorite / longshot Exacta in the men's 50 free - Cesar Cielo and Anthony Ervin, anyone? How about being able to bet the Trifecta on any podium at the Games?

Obvious opportunity for corruption and scandal aside, the idea does have its upsides. Like legalizing marijuana in California or legalizing Internet gambling in all 50 states, opening up wagering on swimming could instantly cure many financial crises. Things like, say, all of men's college swimming... Alas, few want to hear about vice coming to the rescue.

In the meantime, here's a noble way to get your gambling fix on in Olympic sport. Take a look at Charity Bets. Do-gooding meets stock-picking, in sport... A way to gamble on your favorite athletes. And when you win, you give. Come again? Isn't gambling about getting? Yes, well, time to test that old Christmas cliché - it's better to give than to receive...

Here's how it happened: A few sporty finance guys in New York were looking to raise money for cancer research around an athletic event. According to the site, their approach can be summed up with this simple premise: "I bet you can't run this fast, or jump this high, or throw this far." The essence of every challenge between competitors, with an emphasis on the bet. These guys decided to go a step further, set up a site, started contacting athletes, and a beautiful charitable mission was born.

And here's how it works: Pick your athlete and issue your challenge. Pick your favorite charity. Place your bets. Athlete succeeds, you win, you pay up to your chosen worthy cause.

U.S. marathon champion Meb Keflezighi has been the early face of Charity Bets. By winning the U.S. Olympic marathon Trials in Houston last month, Keflezighi won his bets, and raised a boatload for the chosen charities. U.S. sprinters Walter Dix and Justin Gatlin are also on board.

So, the question is, why aren't any swimmers on Charity Bets yet? Why aren't the Olympic Swimming Trials listed on the site as events with open charitable wagering? Right now, there are plenty of options in running, biking, and triathlon. Where are the swimmers?

This is what swimmers do anyway. Last week, I heard Ryan Lochte and Conor Dwyer were talking trash at workout, challenging each other over who could do what in practice. Apparently Lochte tells Dwyer there's no way you can stand up and go 3:48 in the 400 IM, right now. Dwyer takes the bait. Stands up and goes 3:42. In practice. Same time he went at NCAA's last year... Impressing Ryan Lochte must have been nice. Seeing him have to pay up - to a worthy cause - would have been even sweeter.

I'm ready to place some bets. So, here's a challenge to kick this off: Lochte, I've got $100 that says you can't break your world record this year in the 200 IM. You pick the charity.

I would love to pay up.

The Two Mikes

Jordan and Phelps - and the Power of the Slight... I'll show you, they say. You will pay. For your actions, for your words, for your insolence. And pay we do - to witness the ultimate level of athletic achievement. To witness the unfathomable. Their fuel? The disrespect of anyone who dared to doubt.

Michael Jordan and Michael Phelps - mighty rulers of air and water. Two men driven by eerily similar temperaments.

With a new Olympic year under way, likely the last for Phelps, there will be the inevitable search for context and comparisons, as the media descends around the most decorated champion in the history of the Games. There will be lists and tributes and highlight reel eulogies. That's what the media does, right? After the triumph come the replays, the endless analysis.

Phelps is going to finish up with somewhere between 17 and 20 career Olympic gold medals. It's pointless now to compare him to any other Olympian, no matter what happens in his London showdowns with Ryan Lochte. So, instead we're going to cross sports and start sizing him up with other icons. You see it coming, don't you? Tiger and Gretzky and Brady, they'll all enter the conversation. Probably even Ali. But the fact is, Phelps resembles one athlete above all others, another Mike. Another obscenely talented victory addict driven by nothing so much as the need to settle every last slight...

Last week, Sports Illustrated ran a heartbreaking story about the descent of Michael Jordan's high school coach, a guy named Pop Herring. This was the man, in Jordan mythology, who famously cut him from the varsity team at Laney High when MJ was a sophomore. It was a slight that Jordan never let go. He brought it up repeatedly throughout his career - the night they retired his number at the United Center in Chicago, the night of his now infamous score-settling Hall of Fame induction speech.

The story goes on to point out that this was not so much a slight as the wise move of a smart young high school coach. (Herring was in his late 20's when he coached Jordan at Laney...) Rather than let his precocious superstar-in-waiting ride the pine for an entire season as a sophomore, Herring placed Jordan on the JV squad - where he started and dominated. And because of that, when his junior year came around, Jordan was ready to lead the team. But today's story is not about rehashing Jordan's slightly fictional mania, it's about a single quote in that SI piece. One that might define Mr. MP as much as it describes MJ.

According to SI: "Jordan would become a world-class collector of emotional wounds, a champion grudge-holder, a magician at converting real and imagined insults into rocket fuel that made him fly."

It's that last line that made me stop reading. A magician at converting real and imagined insults into rocket fuel that made him fly... That made him fly indeed. Who was I reading about again?

The stories about this special rocket fuel are legion with Phelps, just as they are with Jordan. After his eighth gold in Beijing, in NBC's Olympic studios, he recounted for Bob Costas long remembered slights through the years. He recalled the 12-year-old who dissed him way back when, how he refused to admit he remembered the guy when he came up to him years later, backslapping the now famous aqua king.

And of course there was Mike Cavic, the maimed tiger poker. Back in 2009, do you remember his taunts at the World Champs in Rome? Well, they weren't really taunts, no more than Pop Herring cruelly ignored Jordan's talent. But they were enough to provoke the champ, someone forever attuned to provocation. After charging past Cavic in the 100 fly final in Rome, becoming the first man ever to break the 50-second barrier in the event, Phelps unleashed a defiant Jordan-esque celebration.

Post race, with sly understatement, Phelps had this to say: "Things motivate me -- sometimes comments, sometimes what people do. That's just how I tick."

Don't mistake this fuel for your standard locker room fodder disrespect. The half-bright bluster of a Rex Ryan quote that the Giants use to get fired up before the game. It's far beyond these manufactured how dare he clichés. It's also on another level from the guys who are forever determined to prove themselves after being doubted way back when... Consider the exploits of Tom Brady or Aaron Rogers, or even that guy named Tebow.

No, this is something relentlessly renewed, hunted for... It's personal and there is nothing phony or contrived about it. When it comes to the fire breathing competitive spirit of a Jordan or a Phelps, ever utterance can be converted into the need to crush any infidel.

It's pathological - in the most proud and productive sense. At least when channeled into the field of competition...

About a year and a half ago, back in the fall of 2010, I had my own brush with this dark magic. I was, briefly, the "slight du jour". It was over a piece that called into question Phelps' preparedness after falling flat in the 400 IM at the 2010 Pan Pacific Games in Irvine. It questioned his decision to swim the sport's hardest event after admittedly limited training. It might have poked at the tiger's ego a bit. Soon, the rumbles found their way back to me. I'd known the Phelps family since Michael was three years old, family friends going way way back in Baltimore. Now I was persona non grata. The enemy. A doubter. And doubters deserve to be punished.

This should not have been too surprising. In fact, a part of me probably wanted to pay -- a slightly selfish swim fan who wanted to provoke the greatest IM'er in history into returning to his signature race. Poke that ego a bit and maybe he'll feel the need to show me, and everyone else who doubts his ability to reach those Beijing heights again. Unfair? Only if you take it personal.

Which of course is the whole point. Who knows, another slight may even be found in this story (pathological?!), even as I'm comparing him to the greatest competitor of the 20th Century...

One can only hope.

Story By Numbers

Who cares about commentary, where are the results? It's all about the times. That is, the numbers, those down-to-the-hundredth facts, the ones that tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Results are what makes this sport so objectively beautiful. It's a universal language where nothing can be lost in translation. There's no third party trying to interpret what just happened on a field of play. No judges holding up subjective numbers or rankings that are inherently open for dispute. A clock starts with a beep, it records your progress at each wall, and it stops for good when your hand touches the finish. Beyond that, all else is just passing the time.

Which is why this site is about to add an essential element. A Results section. (Perhaps you've already noticed the toolbar additions above...)

In the coming weeks, a calendar of international meets will be posted. And in an Olympic year, there will be plenty. When that meet takes place, wherever it is in the world, a link will be posted where you can find the results. Sound simple enough? These results can be found elsewhere, I realize, but it frequently takes some searching. It won't be all-encompassing, tracking down each and every regional junior meet from Florida to Shanghai; instead it will be a curated list of meets that fans of Olympic swimming might care about. Grand Prix's, World Cups, Olympic Trials, NCAA's, European Champs, etc.

As fun as it is to dissect and analyze the athletes and the issues, what else is there, really, that's more interesting to swimmers than the actual results of a meet? That's the first thing I look for, before I read anyone's report on what happened... I want to read the story in the numbers. Because those numbers are far more honest and eloquent than what anyone could report.

It's akin to baseball box scores, the past performances of race horses in the Daily Racing Form, or stock charts that look like numerical gibberish to those who can't tease out fortunes from the hidden-in-plain-site patterns... For the savants of any sport or business, the numbers will always tell stories rich with life, a narrative without sentences but filled with deep meaning.

Take a look at the chart below. These are the results from the men's 200 freestyle at the 2009 World Championships in Rome. It was perhaps the tipping point of the super suits, the race that forced regulation, the race that led Bob Bowman to threaten to take his proverbially ball and go home if something wasn't done about those damn suits. Have a look:

What story do these numbers tell? Without any context whatsoever, you can look at Paul Biedermann's splits and be astonished. Not only by the final time that shattered the world record by almost a second, but by each number that came before it. Going out in 50.12 to the feet. Widening his lead over the third 50 by a few tenths. But leaving Phelps within striking distance, just four-tenths back. The man with the greatest last wall in the history of the sport, the guy who breaks wills over the final 50 meters, the one who's proven time and again that, if it's close with a lap to go, it's all over. But not this time...

On this day in Rome, Paul Biedermann made Phelps look human. An outmatched, outgunned, overwhelmed human. Biedermann came home in 25.70. Almost a second faster than Phelps. You don't need to watch the race to get it. You don't need NBC's Dan Hicks and Rowdy Gaines to call the race and explain what just went down in order to get it. All you need to see is the numbers.

But do those numbers really tell the whole truth and nothing but? Not really. Do they point out that Biedermann was aided by a suit that seemed to enhance his performance - and his particular body type - more than that of his competitors? Do the numbers illustrate Phelps' total lack of post-Olympic training? Well, they do if you know the context of the race. But the stand-alone digits only tell the story on the surface. They tell the story of a race - one that started and ended for all eight finalists in 106 seconds. And on that day, no matter what anyone was wearing, no matter who had trained more or less, here are the facts as laid out by the numbers: Paul Biedermann swam 200 meters faster than any human ever has before, while thrashing the greatest swimmer in history one lane over.

"Remember that the life of this world is but a sport and a pastime."

Those lines came from the Koran, apparently. Not a text I can claim to know much about, but wise words worth contemplating. And worth considering the difference between the two perhaps... A sport, in its purest sense, can be distilled in simple numbers, in silence. In the results. A pastime? That's what the rest of us do, trying to understand it.

Happy New Year, everyone.

Blown Out on the Trail

Checking in with the Comeback Crew... There won't be many happy endings. Most of these stories will end with an underwhelmed whimper. Some will end well before London. If gold and a return to past glory is perhaps an unfair and unrealistic expectation, then what can be expected of this Olympic jonesing cast of comeback junkies? A proud and respectable showing? The ability to say the inevitable "I have no regrets" with a straight and believable face?

Two months back, I wrote about the strange trend of so many past champions unable to resist the lure of London. Back in the water, back on the sauce, desperate for another hit of Olympic crack. Well, now the results have begun to roll in. Some seem to have picked up right where they left off, some are exceeding expectations, and others... Well, others may be fighting that nasty virus called Doubt right about now.

So, let's take a look. Starting with the biggest dog of all... the mighty Ian Thorpe. I know I'm not alone in saying that there's no comeback I'm pulling for more. Thorpe is a class act. Much smarter than your average superstar athlete, with a self awareness and eloquence that has always cast our sport in the finest light. We all want to see him back on the blocks in London, flanked by Phelps and Lochte, ready to deliver a 200 free showdown for the ages. Problem is, that's beginning to seem less and less likely. His recent times are not inspiring confidence.

At the recent Italian Nationals, the Thorpedo was not exactly living up to his nickname. His times: 50.8 in the 100 free / 1:51.5 in the 200 free. Ouch. Now, don't read too much into this. Thorpe is still going to make the Aussie Team. He's going to drop a load of time in both those races at his Trials. I'm betting he wins the 200 Down Under and also qualifies on the Aussie's 4x100 free relay - one that will probably be the favorite in London. Still, he's running out of time; the Aussie Trials are in March. And while I can see him going 1:46 or so in the 200, that won't put him anywhere near the podium in London.

What about his guitar-smashing compadre Michael Klim? A bit faster lately - 49.8 in the 100 at a recent meet in Melbourne. Think he grabs a spot on the Team too, probably as a prelims-only guy on that 4x100 relay... Which will make his return a success, I suppose, but how much more can really be said about being the fifth or sixth fastest guy in your country in one event? As for Thorpe, he knows that anything less than a London dog fight with the two-headed Phepte beast will go down as a disappointment...

Speaking of smarter than average Olympic champs with flawless freestyles... Here's a comeback that's shaping up beautifully out in the Berkeley hills. Last week, Anthony Ervin showed he's back in the game with a vengeance, posting two impossible to ignore times: 19.4 in the 50 and 42.6 in the 100. While conversion from yards to long course meters is a highly inexact science, I'd say that translates to around 22.5  and 49-low in the big pool. I'll admit a bit of bias here, as Tony is a friend and former colleague here in New York, but like Thorpe, this is a comeback worth rooting for. Not only because it's a terrific story about re-embracing long discarded other-worldly talent, but because Tony is doing it with grace and humility. Congratulated recently for his times last week, he replied that while encouraging, there's still a long ways to go - and then cited Nathan Adrian's frequent schooling of him in Cal workouts as evidence of exactly what he's up against.

Ah yes, humility... And then there's the breaststrokers. First the good news. Brendan Hansen has clearly not missed a beat. His winning times at the recent U.S. Nationals - 1:00.3 in the 100 and 2:09.6 in the 200 - prove that he's not just on track to make the Team, but that he has a shot to threaten his arch-rival Kosuke Kitajima for gold in London.

A bit further down the breaststroke results page, you'll find Ed Moses. His comeback has produced a hip hop music video, a reality TV show, oh, and he made it all the way to the 'C' final at the recent U.S. Nationals. I'm all for shameless self-promotion, but only when there's a bit of substance to back it up... Note to the savvy programmers at Universal Sports: See 'Dan & Dave', circa 1992.

At the other end of the spectrum, there's a pair of ageless beauties with plenty of substance - Dara Torres and Amanda Beard. Both of these ladies clearly like to have their picture taken, and they've both been very savvy in promoting themselves beyond the pool, but they back it up, year after year after year, with brilliant performances when they hit the water. At some point, you'd think we'd stop being surprised. Months before the next Games, and there's Torres and Beard once again posting eye-popping times, on track to return to yet another Games. At some point a body has to slow and age. Doesn't it? No telling when with these two though...

Finally, there's the comeback that remains a bit of a mystery. Does anyone know how Janet Evans has been swimming? Despite repeated Google searches with every conceivable keyword, I could not find any results at all for her since she swam at Masters Nationals last summer. Those times - 4:19 in the 400 and 8:50 in the 800 - show that there's still a very long way to go - just to get to the U.S. Trials. But Evans was one of the hardest working, most determined champions in Olympic history; it seems ludicrous to count her out. Still, has she not been to a single meet this fall? At the Golden Goggles at L.A. last month, Summer Sanders conducted a table-side interview with her former Barcelona teammate, and the first thing Summer said was that she'd promised Janet she wouldn't ask about the comeback. Ok...

So, now you know. Fascinating stories, as they go... Everybody loves a comeback. But sooner or later, the clock stops. To steal a pun from Mr. Ervin: Only time will tell.

Watered Down

The Bloating of the U.S. Olympic Trials: Many cuts were faster 20 years ago... It's the ultimate swim meet. The most pressure drenched, heartbreaking, dream-making competition known to swimmers. Plenty of Olympians have said it was a bigger deal to them than the actual Olympics. The U.S. Olympic Trials, where the greatest aquatic athletes from the world's preeminent swimming nation gather every four years to vie for a few precious spots on the Team... If you've made it there, you've made it to the big time.

Except making it isn't quite as big time as it once was.

These days, making Trials is easier than it's ever been. In fact, in many events, the U.S. Olympic Trials cuts were faster 20 years ago. (A few examples: men's 200 fly cut back in 1992: 2:03.19. In 2012: 2:03.99; men's 200 back in '92: 2:04.19. In 2012: 2:04.99)  Feel free to have a look. Current and past time standards for U.S. national meets are available right HERE on the USA Swimming website.

It's absurd to state that making the American Trials is in any way "easy." It remains the deepest, most brutally competitive meet there is. But over the years, those Trials have put on a few pounds. The ranks of Olympic Trials Qualifiers have ballooned. Based on the number of swimmers at the meet, it is now three times easier to get there in 2012 that it was 20 years ago in 1992. The numbers don't lie. The cuts used to be faster, but the men and women placing first and second back then were a whole lot slower. That means that a lot less swimmers used to qualify for the meet. And the ones who did were in the game, each with a legitimate, if long shot, claim at making the Team. It was akin to making NCAA's. About 24 swimmers per event, the ideal being three circle seated heats in prelims, no more. Now we settle in for a marathon of unseated heats before reaching those top 24...

USA Swimming's Great Guru (I mean, Assistant Executive Director) Mike Unger laid it out for me at lunch last week. He knows these numbers off the top of his head. In 1992, there were around 500 swimmers at the meet. In '96, that number dipped to about 400. In 2000, when USA Swimming briefly eliminated Junior Nationals, the ranks of Trials qualifiers exploded, with a meet of 1225 swimmers. When Juniors returned, that number settled back down again; in 2004, there were 730 swimmers at the Trials in Long Beach. In 2008, at the sold out Quest Center in Omaha, there were 1225 qualifiers there. And next summer, back again in Omaha, how many are expected? About 1500.

Swimmers keep getting faster, but the price of admission stays the same. Or, in the case of most of the men's events, the price is cheaper than it was a generation ago.

There are many fine reasons for this. Indeed, the U.S. Trials is a better event now that so many are admitted. Just because it's easier to get there does not make it lesser. In fact, quite the opposite. The meet now sells out a 12,000 seat arena. If each of those 1500 swimmers brings their mom and dad, that's a quarter of the nightly ticket sales right there. Something like the AquaZone, that world's fair-esque attraction in the convention hall alongside the pool, would have been unthinkable 20 years ago. That's not a product of Michael Phelps' presence, it's due to the huge number of fast young swimmers now in his midst.

I'm told that some of this Trials-expansion philosophy came from Eddie Reese. He cited the example of a 16-year-old high school flyer who barely makes the Trials cut in the 100 fly, comes to the meet, places 86th, but gains the invaluable experience of being there, seeing what it takes. Four years later, that promising young flyer is now a sophomore NCAA All-American (presumably now a Longhorn, swimming for Reese!), and he's racing into the finals with a great shot to make the Team. Did that lower standard of admission help this sample swimmer's progression? The committee of top coaches who determine such things certainly thought so. They endorsed it 100%.

This mindset has created a curious new species of swimmer at the meet: the Trials Tourist. The swimmers who make the cuts and travel to Omaha without the slightest hope in hell of actually becoming an Olympian. Next summer, there will conservatively be about 1,000 or so Trials Tourists like this. Two-thirds of the young men and women who take their marks in Omaha will do so without any real dream of going to London.

Compare this to the men's 100 fly back in 1992. The Trials cut was 55.59. What did it take to make the Team that year? 54.01. Just a second and a half gap between the last seed who barely qualified and the time it took to become an Olympian. A second and a half. That's a realistic drop. A big improvement, to be sure, but nothing outlandish. Fair to say that every man in that event allowed himself to visualize making the Team and going to Barcelona.

20 years later, that 100 fly cut has become marginally faster (one of few). Now's it's 55.29. But what will it take to make the Team? Likely a 51-low. Four full seconds below the cut. A 54.0 won't even be noticed by anyone beyond your coach, parents, and teammates. It will be one of many, a mid-pack, heat 4, lane 7 prelims swim.

This says an awful lot about the insane depth of swimming in America. Unger points out that when they set the Trials time standards back in 2010, they expected around 800-1000 swimmers to qualify. They were uncertain what the effect of the now-banned super suits would have on the times. Turns out those suits weren't so valuable after all. No one expected 1500 to charge past these now pedestrian time standards. This says great things about the seemingly limitless depth in American swimming, says Unger. And the Quest Center can certainly accommodate these swelling ranks, with two 50-meter pools, another 25-meter warm-up pool, more than enough seating, and a meet spread over a long eight days.

It's a truism in swimming that there is no more depressing place to be than on deck on the last day of Olympic Trials. It's a time when 99% of the swimmers there are devastated, their Olympic dreams dashed. A small handful glide around deck with the new insufferable glow of the Olympian. The rest remain mere mortals. They got so close, but not far, or fast, enough. Maybe this was true back in 1992, when all the swimmers there had a right to dream of making the Team. But is that really the case these days? How crushed can the 1,000 Trials Tourists really be? It's not like they're arriving with realistic hopes of going to London. They're there for the "experience." Which is fair enough, but let's not pretend that experience is as prestigious as it once was.

This is a time, less than seven months from those Trials, when many young swimmers are currently tapering and shaving for regional meets, trying to make those elusive cuts, trying to punch their ticket to the big one in Omaha this summer. It's a high honor to be sure, but these days, many more will make it.

Most will be Tourists. But who will be Travelers?

Comeback Junkies

He left the press conference for his more famous friend. The one who had more gold medals than any countryman before him. He had a few too, was also among Australia's all-time greats, but by comparison, his news didn't feel all that newsworthy. Another comeback. By another Olympic champion. Welcome aboard, Michael Klim. The comeback trail is crowded these days, packed with aquatic icons who can't quite stay away...

When Ian Thorpe announced his intentions, it was sponsored by Richard Branson, as the Virgin mega-mind used the Thorpedo's return as a fine opportunity to announce Virgin Blue's latest international route. (You didn't think Thorpe was actually going to train for London in Abu Dhabi, did you?) When Michael Klim announced his own comeback, he chose a bit less corporate pomp. His venue? A comedy radio show, with a handful of local TV news cameras crowded into the studio.

Eleven years ago at the Sydney Games, these two were elevated to god-like stature Down Under. I remember an office tower in downtown Sydney whose entire 50 stories on one side was covered in a long picture of a pool, with Thorpe and Klim, along with (the still retired) Susie O'Neill swimming up lanes stretching hundreds of feet into the air. (Just one example; probably plenty...) Now, three Games removed, their legend-status engraved for all-time, these Aussie gents are hooked again, and they're not alone.

Stateside, have a look at the list of confirmed comebackers back on the sauce: Janet Evans, Brendan Hansen, Anthony Ervin, Ed Moses. And those are just the Olympic champs back in the mix. Rumors have swirled about an Ian Crocker comeback. (Still no official paperwork filed, according to USA Swimming...) And at the risk of starting a rumor, word is that Aaron Peirsol has yet to file his retirement paperwork. Perhaps leaving a door to Trials slightly ajar...

Across the pond, France's drama-soaked freestyle queen, Laure Manaudou, is immersed in a comeback of her own. England's ageless sprint ace, Mark Foster, is said to be contemplating another crack at it on home soil. And who could blame him? He's the male Brit version of Dara Torres. Both obscenely ripped sprint specimens who should not be allowed to look so mockingly good into their 40's.

Maybe it's Torres who's to blame for all these second acts. Did she make it look too damn easy? Would anyone be surprised to see her on the blocks in London too? She'll be 45 next summer. Back in 2000, a 15-year-old Michael Phelps used to call her "mom." A dozen years later, Missy Franklin could refer to her as "grandma."

Should this spate of comebacks be christened 'Torres Syndrome'? Surely, the thought must have crossed Janet Evans' mind as she considered her return to competitive waters. Evans was twice the swimmer Torres was. No comparison. Back in 1988, when Janet was the greatest female swimmer on the planet, Torres was a relay swimmer, earning a single bronze as a member of the women's 4x100 free. There's no question that Torres has been a compelling example for all these folks. The question is - what kind of example has she set?

You read about these comebacks and the lines are all the same. It's for the love of the sport... The fire still burns... I have unfinished business... I wanted to be a part of the Olympics just once more... Or as Klim put it recently to Craig Lord of Swim News: "We're all doing it for the same reason: swimming was a big part of our lives and we still feel it."

But what is it that you feel? Because this culture of comebacks sounds an awful lot like a Narcotics Anonymous meeting, a crew of relapsed junkies who just happen to be hooked on a drug of pure Olympism. It's hard to imagine two more polar opposite clans. The heroin addict and the Olympic champion. At distant ends of the spectrum of society's respect. One group, pitied and reviled, the other, praised on the ultimate sporting pedestal. Yet at the extremes, we always find similarities...

Consider: For both groups, the junkie and the Olympian, the "it" is two-fold, and exactly the same. They miss the high, for one. And as good as a heroin high must surely feel, it can't compare to the high of standing on top of an Olympic podium. But that's only part of it. The bigger part, the essential part, is about the lifestyle. It's a common refrain among ex-addicts. They talk of the purity of purpose, of the single-mindedness that gets them through each day. Where the rest of the world has daily to-do lists, headaches to confront and check off each and every day, the addict has only one concern: how to continue the high.

As does the swimmer back on the Olympic trail. All those worldly concerns that invaded your life after retirement? Your job, your family, your bills. Back on the backburner! Because as each of these comebackers knows, as every swimmer who's ever appeared in any Olympics knows, getting to the Games demands total sacrificial commitment. To the point of setting aside the rest of your life and acknowledging it for what it is - distractions. Distractions that get in the way of the one thing you care about more than anything else... That high. That feeling of invincibility, of total bliss, when there is nothing but the now, nothing but the passion to get what you need, what you've had before, and what you must have again...

Junkies are reviled, and rightly so, because their need and their bliss is self-destructive and false. Olympians, at the other end, are praised because that same need is believed to come from a pure and true place. They are not destroying their bodies, but elevating them to ultimate levels of perfection. But the motivation, the drive, the personality is all too similar.

Years ago, when Aussie great Susie O'Neill (remember, the one on that Sydney building not making a comeback?) retired, a reporter asked her what she would miss most about swimming. Her answer was honest and heartbreaking. She said: "I'll miss never being the best in the world at anything else ever again."

That's a hard addiction to kick. As her fellow Olympic champions, now immersed in comebacks, know all too well...

The Phelps Effect

Is the cupboard bare for Team USA? Beneath the superstar surface, all was not well at the World Championships in Shanghai. While Phelpte, the two-headed headline monster, was not so quietly collecting twelve medals between them, there was a curious void among the rest of the American men. Yes, Ryan Lochte was the new king, we read all about it. And yes, Michael Phelps was back, re-motivated and back to his astonishing self. But where were the rest of them? Not on the podium. Not in the breaststrokes, nor the sprint frees, nor the distance events, not even in the 100 back - for decades (yes, literally decades) the single most dominant event in American men's swimming. Where was that devastating depth, for so long the hallmark of Team USA?

Aside from Tyler Clary, who collected a silver and a bronze behind Mr. Lochte in the 400 IM and 200 back, and Tyler McGill, who claimed bronze in the 100 fly behind Mr. Phelps, no other American men appeared on the World Championships podium in an individual event. Perhaps most tellingly, the men struggled mightily to win the race that has always been a foregone conclusion - the 4 x 100 medley relay. With pedestrian mid-pack splits on the front half, it was up to Mr. Phelps to deliver a crushing fly split that supplied Nathan Adrian with enough of a lead to hold off the charging Aussie James Magnussen on the end. The two-tenth victory was their slimmest margin for gold ever in a major competition; it was also almost five full seconds slower than the world record (albeit a tainted suit-assisted record from '09...). It's dangerous to read too much into one meet, but it's also hard to ignore a wider trend here.

Call it the Phelps Effect. Wherein the talent and ambition of fellow countrymen is drained and daunted in the face of insurmountable dominance... Well, insurmountable for all but one, it seems. Ryan Lochte hasn't been daunted, and now, as this is typed, he has surpassed Phelps as the consensus top swimmer on earth. Not by much, to be sure. But there is no one else even remotely in the running. Which would seem to make Lochte the exception that proves an uncomfortable rule...

In a terrific Sports Illustrated profile on Lochte in the lead-up to Shanghai, Bob Bowman gave credence to this Phelps Effect. "Michael has destroyed a lot of people psychologically," said Bowman. "There are a number of swimmers who came up against Michael, found it impossible to beat him and just gave up. But Ryan was never fazed."

No one on the planet has witnessed that as up close as the Great One's own coach. While Bowman is hardly objective in his assessment, he's not wrong. And he's not the only one to voice it. One of Phelps' former training partners at the University of Michigan has personally told me as much. "He just broke spirits," said this swimmer. "He certainly did it to me." This from a former National Team member and multiple time All-American at Michigan. He went on to tell me about glancing underwater off of turns in workouts and watching Phelps' utterly depressing superiority. "He's just so much better, so much more efficient, it makes you question what you're doing."

While talent can't be faked or willed into being, it's confidence that has always separated the very good from the great. Unshakeable, blind, smiling, eternal confidence. The sort embodied by Ryan Lochte. Of his many admirable traits, it's that unshakeable self-confidence that allowed Lochte to surpass, for now, his mighty rival. And it was certainly given a good hard shake - to the tune of a couple dozen head-to-head defeats in major competitions.

A few years back, on the bottom of the world, another theory of talent drain was floated by a swim-obsessed Aussie media. Back then it was the Thorpe Effect, as the Australians wondered aloud whether or not Ian Thorpe's prodigious achievements had scared away the next generation in his wake. Predictably, there were howls of protests from the coaching quarters. That's ridiculous, they insisted. Not my swimmers, they snorted. If anything wouldn't Thorpe have inspired and motivated, rather than discouraged? Well, yes and no. No one was denying that, long term, Thorpe raised the standard of excellence for his Aussie torchbearers, challenging those who came next to dream that much bigger. But what of his contemporaries, swimmers the same age or just a bit younger? Among this group, there appears to be evidence that the Thorpe Effect was all too real. That is, until it was cured this year.

In the years between Ian Thorpe's retirement and recent comeback, the Aussie men seemed to regress. Indeed, in 2010, there was not a single Australian man ranked in the top six in the world in any freestyle event. It was as if Thorpe, along with compatriot Grant Hackett, had snuffed out the will of their immediate heirs apparent. A few years had to pass before it was ok for Aussie freestylers to ascend the podium again. In 2011 at the Worlds, they shook off the Effect with some statement-making swims. Led by 20-year-old James Magnussen and his 4x100 free relay teammates, the Aussie mates rediscovered their mojo. We all knew it was temporary, but that doesn't mean the Thorpe Effect didn't exist.

At least for the men. It must be noted that this strange will-sucking ailment does not appear to cross gender lines. It appears to have an inverse effect among the women. As the Aussie men struggled over the last five years or so, the Australian women surged. Just as a growing crop of American women, led by the incredible Missy Franklin, appear to be shaping up as Team USA's deepest women's squad in over a decade.

Deny it all you like, coaches, but the same thing is now happening stateside. Consider Team USA without the Phelpte monster for a moment. Who would be the face of the franchise? Before your next-best knee-jerk reply, let's acknowledge that a face of the USA Swimming franchise should probably be a world record holder who is expected to win gold, as the clear dominating favorite... Meaning certain would-be champions in waiting still have some (im)proving to do. Sure there are insane talents on the rise, who will surely be an international presence soon enough. (Yes, watch out for David Nolan, Ryan Murphy, et all...) But those phenoms still have a few years to ripen. Until then, get ready for symptoms of the Phelps Effect to worsen before they get better.

Unless of course Ryan Lochte would care to share the vaccine.